Originally published in the Fort
Wayne Journal Gazette
Editorial: By E. Mitchell Roob Jr.
and Steve Smith
August 14, 2006
Your 92-year-old widowed
grandmother falls down and breaks her hip. She stays at
the hospital for a few days after surgery and then
transfers to a rehabilitation facility. After another
week, she transitions to a nursing home, the first
several months paid for by Medicare. Your family
questions: “More than three months after Grandma first
fell, is the nursing facility the most appropriate
setting for her?” She wants to be independent, active
and healthy.
Should your family consider an
assisted-living facility, moving back home with the
assistance of a personal attendant or adult day care?
Regardless of the choice, you, your parents and your
grandmother have just become customers of long-term-care
services in the State of Indiana.
Although a comprehensive care
facility, such as a nursing home, is often the best
option, many seniors would prefer and are able to live
more independently. The Indiana Family and Social
Services Administration supports 25,000 people in
nursing facilities across the state, but only a fraction
of this number is in alternative care settings. For
example, fewer than 200 are supported in assisted-living
facilities.
Last year, FSSA directed 75 percent
of its $1.65 billion long-term care dollars to
institutional care, while only 25 percent of those
dollars were spent on long-term care alternatives such
as home health care, assisted living and adult day
services. Since the financial criteria for nursing-home
coverage by Medicaid are less restrictive than the
criteria for alternative care, the choice of a long-term
care option often becomes a financial decision, not a
quality-of-life decision. We do not want to force this
unfortunate decision on our seniors.
Our goal is simple: Modify the
long-term care business model through direct
intervention into both the supply of and demand for
long-term care services. To accomplish this, FSSA is
working closely with health care providers, professional
associations and advocacy groups to create a new image
of long-term care as a spectrum of options, from
community-based services, such as assisted living and
adult day care, to nursing homes.
This business model modification is
imperative to control our long-term care expenditures
and provide our aging baby boomers with the long-term
care options they will demand.
FSSA must make significant policy
changes. Once enrolled in Medicaid, a qualified senior
is entitled to care in a nursing home but not entitled
to care in an alternative setting. Therefore, we must
establish uniform financial eligibility for
institutional and community-based care models to truly
give seniors choice.
Adjusting reimbursement rates will
make home- and community-based options financially
feasible. For example, on July 1 rates for assisted
living services increased 25 percent. This adjustment
will close the gap between reimbursement for assisted
living and nursing home care. Rates for all other
options to nursing homes will also increase
substantially.
Modified, less restrictive policies
and appropriate financial incentives for long-term care
providers will also encourage the needed development of
physical infrastructure for alternative care models.
FSSA’s proactive efforts will prompt entrepreneurs to
consider entering the long-term care marketplace. Most
importantly, customers will have a level playing field
in order to make the best choice for their particular
situation.
While the supply is being
developed, the demand for home- and community-based
options must also grow. FSSA will also embark on an
educational campaign to present long-term care as a
single service offering that contains multiple options,
not simply nursing homes or nothing. Fewer than
2 percent of referrals to nursing homes in Indiana are
made by the family or individual who needs the care.
Ninety-eight percent are made by another person or
entity. Therefore, FSSA must actively market to a wide
array of customers and stakeholders to ensure that all
long-term care options are considered.
The development of alternative care
models for seniors is a vital step toward creating an
integrated long-term care solution. Moving forward, FSSA,
partner organizations, families and seniors must also
work together to address other important issues
surrounding care for our seniors.
We should discuss who finances
their care and promote personal responsibility options,
such as purchasing long-term care insurance. We must
define quality care and hold providers accountable to
high standards. After all, Indiana has an obligation to
our aging Hoosiers to allow them to age with dignity in
the setting of their choice.
E. Mitchell Roob Jr. is
secretary of the Indiana Family and Social
Services Administration. Steve Smith is director
of FSSA’s Division of Aging. They wrote this for
Indiana newspapers.